News and Views on Tibet

Tibetans lose Nepal as safe haven

Share on facebook
Share on google
Share on twitter

By Damakant Jayshi

KATHMANDU – Kelsang, 22, says that he left his monastery in Tibet after “Chinese officials asked us to denounce the revered Dalai Lama and introduced practices in our religion that were not acceptable to us”. He later decided to escape from Tibet, going south to Nepal, as did other Tibetans interviewed by IPS, such as teenage girls Metho and Penkye and three men apart from Kelsang – 22-year-old Sonam, 27-year-old Adaie and 33-year-old Karma.

All except Sonam and Kelsang arrived in Nepal in May, and Karma says that he had to travel for more than two months through mountainous passes before arriving in the Nepali capital. Like many others before them, these Tibetans expected to be safe in the Himalayan kingdom before crossing the open border to go further south to India, where the Dalai Lama runs a government-in-exile.

But now they are at a loss over what lies ahead for those planning to escape Tibet. To the shock of Tibetans and anger among many, 18 Tibetans who crossed the border to Nepal on their way to India were caught by Nepali police and turned over to Chinese officials at the weekend.

China has claimed sovereignty over Tibet since it sent in troops in 1951. But Tibet remains home to a restive population, including groups that want to separate from China and say that Beijing is trying to stamp out Tibetan culture and religion. The Dalai Lama fled Tibet after a failed uprising against Chinese rule in 1959.

Since the weekend turnover of the Tibetans, foreign governments and rights groups have expressed concern over the action of Nepal, located between giant neighbors China to the north and India toward the south. In an interview, Wangchuk Tsering, a representative of the Dalai Lama in Nepal, said Kathmandu had breached a 1989 “verbal agreement” under which it would turn over Tibetan asylum seekers to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR). Under this agreement, the Tibetans were then sent to third countries, mainly India, said Tsering. His office, however, is not recognized by the Nepalese government.

The 18 Tibetans deported were among a group of 21 who arrived in Nepal on April 15. They were caught by Nepalese police at Thankot, a checkpoint just 10 kilometers from the main center of Kathmandu and handed over to the Department of Immigration. This was not unusual as sometimes the police do nab some refugees – but they were never deported. Until Saturday, that is. The 18 Tibetans were first kept in the Immigration Department’s custody from April 17 to May 29 before being handed over to Chinese embassy officials on May 31 – despite appeals from the 25,000-strong Tibetan community in Nepal and the UNHCR. The remaining three in the group are children, two girls and a boy, who were handed over to the UNHCR.

The Nepalese government maintains that there has been no shift in policy towards “escaping Tibetans”, and Foreign Affairs Minister Narenda Bikram Shah says that Kathmandu remains “sensitive” to them. But activists say that the deportation harms Nepal’s role as a haven for refugees from neighboring places like Tibet and Bhutan.

Cheng Ji, chief of the political and press section at the Chinese Embassy in Kathmandu, said that the 18, “who are Chinese citizens, basically”, will be tried under “our own Chinese law” for illegally crossing the international border and coming to Nepal.

Criticism was especially bitter because the Tibetan community in Nepal, with the Dalai Lama’s office in Kathmandu taking the lead, had been collecting the amount that the immigration department said the group needed to pay – 8,000 rupees (US$105) per head – or face a 10-month jail term for illegally crossing into Nepal. Tsering claimed that even this fine was unheard of in the past, saying that every year 2,000 to 2,500 Tibetans make good the escape across mountain passes to Nepal.

Speaking to local press, Tsering appealed to Nepal’s government – which in recent years has had more economic, business and tourism ties with China though it has traditionally been closer to India – “not to repeat the incident”.

Gopal Krishna Siwakoti, executive director of INHURED International, a human rights body, blasted the move: “This has been done under Chinese pressure.” Siwakoti demanded immediate ratification by Nepal of the 1951 UN Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and its 1967 additional protocol. The UNHCR has termed the deportation a breach of international refugee law.

(Inter Press Service)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *