Hi guest, Register | Login | Contact Us
Welcome to Phayul.com - Our News Your Views
Mon 22, Jul 2019 09:49 PM (IST)
Search:     powered by Google
 MENU
Home
News
Photo News
Opinions
Statements &
Press Releases

Book Reviews
Movie Reviews
Interviews
Travels
Health
Obituaries
News Discussions
News Archives
Download photos from Tibet
 Latest Stories
Tibetan leadership offers condolences over the demise of former Delhi CM Sheila Dikshit
Brawl among Tibetan youths in Belgium leaves 4 injured, Police begin probe
Only Dalai Lama has the right over his reincarnation, Chinese statement politically motivated: Dalai Lama's office
Dalai Lama greets the first woman president of the European Commission
His Holiness’ message of religious harmony is doing magic in Ladakh: Sonam Wangchuk
Niece of slain Tibetan religious leader urges Trump to support Tibet, Dalai Lama’s return
Speaker Pelosi condemns Xi Jinping for persecuting people for their faith
Compassion is indispensable for a good doctor: Dalai Lama
Drones, check points and travel restriction at Yachen Gar
India must recognize Beijing’s Dalai Lama or risk ‘major political difference’: Chinese official
Advertisement
Readers' Comments on "Dalai Lama brings message of peace"
The Dalai Lama entered the room smiling, with palms pressed together prayerfully, and saying "sorry, sorry" for being nearly 40 minutes late to his press conference...
 Click here to post your comment
2 comment(s) found You are on page 1 of 1
Name
Comment
indigenous  

Location: uk
Subject: phayul headquarter staff!
Apr 20 2008 10:28 PM

i think phayul is substantially a biased media.. i noticed that it tends to cling more on the news that revokes independence, strong nationalism, anti-tibetan govt. in exile and anti-autonomy and anti-middle path and even anti-peace sometimes. I am saying this because some of the news medias are not enough professional, not-neutral and too biased which may not represent as the good quality in journalism. this is not a criticism to attack phayul for the sake of attacking, because i like phayul for its one of the source for updating news about tibet. but, i just felt like saying this as i believe that it's a constructive criticism which needs to be considered seriously. Otherwise, we would end up like the govt. of China that promotes one side of views and that's it. i am sure that u won't publish this comment and it doesn't matter as my objective is to reach u first to let u know that clear.
Patuk  

Location: oversea
Subject: Too much political concession discourage Tibetan
Apr 20 2008 08:10 AM

I was watching Canada's CBC news interview with His Holiness The Dalai Lama, and surprised me being too soft on China. The Red Chinese inhuman devil authorities always been targetted to assessinate him since 1959 because he is the last evidence of Free Tibet. Tibet experienced real starvation, inhuman torture, mistreatment, insult, death and hell on earth since the Chinese illegally occupied Tibet.
No matter, how much His Holiness shows deep understanding of Chinese desire to host Olympic, and does not use his international influence to boycott it or dismantle Red Chinese effort. The China would still accuse him of massive uprising in Tibet. The 17th Point agreement was officially repudiated by His Holiness in 1959 as a legitimate head of Tibet. However, today your Holiness is trying to revive it, and I am deeply discouraged to carry on our struggle.

Your Holiness, we deeply respect you and also trust you as our saviour from the cyclic existence. Yet, when you make unnecessay political concession to China by re-adopting 17th points agreement, it actually destroys the future of Tibet politically, culturally, spiritually and geographically once for all. Your Middle Path proposal is enough political concession for China. The 17th points agreement is illegal act. as similar as The Shimla agreement of Triparties. Tibet should remain under China or be independent, solely depends how China treats Tibetan and displays trustworthy.

When you were asked, Your Holiness tell me, your perspective whether Tibet is a region, province or country? Your Holiness, did not give any clear indication of Tibet being a country that was governed by you before Chinese regime illegally occupied it. That made me very sad, I don't understand why you were scare to speak the truth that Tibet was a country but future depends on China's response to negotiation.

Please forgive me.
Advertisement
 Latest Topics
LODI GYARI - A LEGENDARY DIPLOMAT - OBITUARY (17:11, 17 Nov 2018)
Govt. of India’s post of advisor for Tibet likely to remain vacant until Xi's 2019 visit (13:11, 16 Nov 2018)
Twitter CEO meets Dalai Lama, calls him “an amazing teacher” (00:11, 15 Nov 2018)
UN says it must respect the “sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity” of China (20:11, 13 Nov 2018)
Nepal applauds China at UPR for its work in Tibet (20:11, 13 Nov 2018)
  Hot Topics
Kiwi - Tibetan teen withdrawn to play football in China after visa delay (0)
“Fake Panchen” elected leader of Buddhist Association in Tibet (0)
How free speech got trampled upon in Sonam Ling settlement (0)
Bhutan moves to decriminalize homosexuality (0)
Tibetan exile capital discusses upcoming Tiananmen Massacre's 30th anniversary (0)
No amount of Tiananmen censorship can conceal the facts: Ai Weiwei (0)
PM Modi snubs Tibetan leadership for swearing-in ceremony (0)
Beijing reiterates reluctance to hold dialogue (0)
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Phayul.com does not endorse the advertisements placed on the site. It does not have any control over the google ads. Please send the URL of the ads if found objectionable to editor@phayul.com
Copyright © 2004-2019 Phayul.com   feedback | advertise | contact us
Powered by Lateng Online