Hi guest, Register | Login | Contact Us
Welcome to Phayul.com - Our News Your Views
Sun 08, Dec 2019 06:30 PM (IST)
Search:     powered by Google
 MENU
Home
News
Photo News
Opinions
Statements &
Press Releases

Book Reviews
Movie Reviews
Interviews
Travels
Health
Obituaries
News Discussions
News Archives
Download photos from Tibet
 Latest Stories
Self-immolations exemplify courage and strength of Tibetans in the face of adversity: His Holiness the Dalai Lama
Anti corruption activist gets 7-year sentence
Kashag's lawyer fails to appear before Tibetan apex court
Family of latest self immolator detained by Chinese police
Prague to sign a “sister city” agreement with Taipei months after cancelling another with Beijing
Beijing fumed after US House passes Uyghur bill
Trial for Tibetan anti-corruption activist to begin 13 months after detention
French police dismantle makeshift camp housing 600 Tibetan asylum seekers
Bureau office urges JNU to exempt Tibetans from fee hike
McLeod Ganj’s iconic ‘Gossip Benh’ demolished for road-widening project
 Latest Photo News
Shrutika Sharma from Nainital, Uttrakhand, wins the Miss Himalaya Pageant 2019, seen with her are first runners up Shalika Rana and second runners up Sapna Devi. Oct. 13, 2019 Phayu Photo: Kunsang Gashon
Nearly 3000 Students from eight countries listened to teachings of His Holiness the Dalai Lama. Three day annual teachings for youth began today. June 3, 2019. Phayul Photo: Kunsang Gashon
His Holiness the Dalai Lama is being escorted to the teaching site at Tsuglakhang temple, May 13, 2019. Phayul Photo: Kunsang Gashon
more photos »
Advertisement
Case No. 20 reviews procedure of Representative’s dismissal
Phayul[Wednesday, August 14, 2019 21:49]
By Tenzin Sangmo

The proceeding of the 8th hearing of Case No. 20 at the TSJC. PC- TSJC
The proceeding of the 8th hearing of Case No. 20 at the TSJC. PC- TSJC
DHARAMSHALA, August: 14: The case no. 20, holding its 8th trial after framing of issues, saw the Tibetan Supreme Justice Commission (TSJC) deal with the two “issues of law” in the defamation case filed by the former Office of Tibet Representative Penpa Tsering against Sikyong Lobsang Sangay led Kashag (Cabinet) of Central Tibetan Administration (CTA).

The first of the two legal issues revolve around the legal procedure in the plaintiff’s termination and whether the ‘warning’ letters qualify as such.

Plaintiff’s Lawyer Namgyal Tsekyi contended that although ‘simple termination’ is the prerogative of the Kashag, it is not what happened. The Kashag’s 10-point clarification issued post the termination maligned the plaintiff, making it a ‘stigmatic termination.’ “The points in the clarification discount the plaintiff’s history of public service, tarnish his public image and negatively affect future endeavors,” she added.

The second part of the issue dealt with whether the letters issued to the plaintiff qualifies as a warning. The plaintiff contended that the letters could only qualify as ‘caution’ because as per the Article 53(b) of the Rules of Conduct of Public Servant (RCPS), a final warning, by definition, requires to be preceded by a show-cause notice, an opportunity to explain and then a warning if the explanation is found to be unsatisfactory.

Petitioner’s lawyer demanded that the Kashag withdraw the words “final warning” in the termination letter issued to the plaintiff as it becomes null and void.

Lobsang Dakpa, the defence lawyer, argued that because the representative is not a public servant but a special appointee, the clause of RCPS doesn’t apply to him. The petitioner vehemently refuted the point stating that the defendant team has no qualms about misinterpreting the provision of laws to serves its interest, at the cost of being self-contradictory.

The second issue of law in the case deals with whether the Kashag misled the Tibetan parliament in exile by not informing it of 1.5 million dollars being taken as loan.

The plaintiff said it violated the Article 7(b) of Audit Act that states that requires all offices to report on fund and loan issues and conditions attached to them.

The defense lawyer said the Kashag didn’t mislead the parliament because the parliament didn’t ask for it and the Kashag didn’t see it as a loan.

The Chief Justice Commission announced that the next hearing will be held on August 21 to address the 8th and the last point of the issues of facts along with the concluding arguments.


Print Send Bookmark and Share
  Readers' Comments »
Be the first to comment on this article

 Other Stories
Case No. 20 reviews procedure of Representative’s dismissal
Three monks from restive Ngaba held incommunicado in Chinese prison
Advertisement
Advertisement
Photo Galleries
Advertisement
Phayul.com does not endorse the advertisements placed on the site. It does not have any control over the google ads. Please send the URL of the ads if found objectionable to editor@phayul.com
Copyright © 2004-2019 Phayul.com   feedback | advertise | contact us
Powered by Lateng Online
Advertisement