Hi guest, Register | Login | Contact Us
Welcome to Phayul.com - Our News Your Views
Sat 14, Dec 2019 02:16 PM (IST)
Search:     powered by Google
Photo News
Statements &
Press Releases

Book Reviews
Movie Reviews
News Discussions
News Archives
Download photos from Tibet
 Latest Stories
Tibetan MPP calls for freedom of Tibetans, Uyghurs and Hong Kongers in Ontario Legislative Assembly
China jailed most journalists in 2019: CPJ report
32nd Task force on Sino-Tibet dialogue meet underway
Tibetan exiles celebrate 30 years since Nobel Prize for Dalai Lama
TSJC revokes license of Case 20 Defense lawyer
Tibetan nuns forced to declare loyalty to CCP
Self-immolations exemplify courage and strength of Tibetans in the face of adversity: His Holiness the Dalai Lama
Anti corruption activist gets 7-year sentence
Kashag's lawyer fails to appear before Tibetan apex court
Family of latest self immolator detained by Chinese police
 Latest Photo News
Shrutika Sharma from Nainital, Uttrakhand, wins the Miss Himalaya Pageant 2019, seen with her are first runners up Shalika Rana and second runners up Sapna Devi. Oct. 13, 2019 Phayu Photo: Kunsang Gashon
Nearly 3000 Students from eight countries listened to teachings of His Holiness the Dalai Lama. Three day annual teachings for youth began today. June 3, 2019. Phayul Photo: Kunsang Gashon
His Holiness the Dalai Lama is being escorted to the teaching site at Tsuglakhang temple, May 13, 2019. Phayul Photo: Kunsang Gashon
more photos »
Defendant seeks extension at the first hearing of Case No. 20
Phayul[Wednesday, June 05, 2019 21:39]
By Tenzin Sangmo

First hearing session of Case No. 20 at TSJC
First hearing session of Case No. 20 at TSJC
DHARAMSHALA, June 5: Case No. 20, better known as LS Vs. PT case saw its first hearing today after a year since it was first lodged. However, it might be stalling again with the defendant’s lawyer requesting the Tibetan Supreme Justice Commission (TSJC) for a three-month extension.

Penpa Tsering, former Tibetan Representative of North America, the plaintiff in the case, filed the case against Dr. Lobsang Sangay led 15th Kashag, after it published a 10-point clarification on 18 Nov 2017 over the former’s termination from the Office of Tibet, Washington on Nov. 7, 2017.

Kashag cited “growing trust deficit, underperformance and insubordination,” as the ground for termination and quoted Chapter 1 Article 1(3) of the Tibetan Charter and Article 19(1) of the Tibetan Public Service Commission rules and regulations that sanction the termination.

Penpa Tsering was accompanied by his lawyer Namgyal Tsekyi while the defendant was represented by its lawyer Lobsang Dakpa, a lawyer and a member Tibetan parliament-in-exile.

The hearing today was devoted to the framing of issues where the Chief Justice Commissioner posed questions on ten issues that one party affirms and another party denies in their respective written statements that require an explanation in order to proceed to trial.

The defendant responded to most questions by saying they were already answered in the written statement. The commissioner, after multiple reminders, categorically stated that the commission will take the responses as being the final.

When the afternoon session began with only two issues left for questioning, the defendant requested for extension of three months in order to come up with an explanation for questions raised.

The plaintiff and his lawyer both objected vehemently to the request saying enough extension has been given and that few more months wouldn’t make any difference.

In her objection, plaintiff’s lawyer spoke on the impact of another extension on prolonging the social, psychological, monetary and time loss suffered by the plaintiff, saying her client would consider demanding a significant compensation in such case.

Notwithstanding the defence lawyer’s expressed readiness to compensate, the plaintiff said he has already spent a considerable amount of time waiting for the case to proceed and reminded the commission that justice delayed could amount to justice being denied.

He further remarked that the defence’s lack of preparedness is a clear indication of its lack of seriousness toward the case and of non-adherence to the series of instructions given by the commission.

“Resolving the case sooner holds the key to resolving the public commotion attached to it,” Tsering said in response to the opponent’s argument that more time would help it frame the answer in detail and therefore lead to a fair trial.

The commissioner said it would consider the application for extension after deliberation with the two other commissioners. It, however, said even if the extension is granted it would be applicable only to the remaining two issues left for discussion.

The defence lawyer, post the hearing, told the media that he has the explanation demanded by the commissioner while the plaintiff said they wouldn’t like to comment on anything at the moment.

Two things were made clear today by the commission – the case is not contesting Kashag’s right to terminate the service of a Representative of Office of Tibet as both parties are in agreement over Kashag’s prerogative and that His Holiness' name cannot be used in the case as he devolved his political power in 2011.

The hearing was attended by Tibetan parliamentarians, media and members of the public. The commission said an announcement would be issued about the date of next hearing or if an extension of any duration is granted to the defence.

Print Send Bookmark and Share
  Readers' Comments »
Be the first to comment on this article

 Other Stories
Defendant seeks extension at the first hearing of Case No. 20
Photo Galleries
Phayul.com does not endorse the advertisements placed on the site. It does not have any control over the google ads. Please send the URL of the ads if found objectionable to editor@phayul.com
Copyright © 2004-2019 Phayul.com   feedback | advertise | contact us
Powered by Lateng Online