Hi guest, Register | Login | Contact Us
Welcome to Phayul.com - Our News Your Views
Tue 28, Mar 2017 11:46 AM (IST)
Search:     powered by Google
Photo News
Statements &
Press Releases

Book Reviews
Movie Reviews
News Discussions
News Archives
Download photos from Tibet
 Latest Stories
Tibetan lawmakers debate on electoral reform, women empowerment
Budget session concludes, electoral reform discussion deferred to next session
Australian Cricket team call on the Dalai Lama
Senior Abbot says forced eviction at Larung Gar nearly over
India should take responsibility to ensure genuine autonomy for Tibet: Former Indian diplomat
Tibetans protest during Chinese premier Li Keqiang’s Australia visit
Lukar's car vandalized, says his family feel 'threatened by anti-social elements'
Yarchen Gar made inaccessible for tourists, foreigners
Dalai Lama’s upcoming trip to border state sparks political debate
Tibetan exiles observe World Water Day
 Latest Photo News
Tibetans participate in a candlelight vigil following news of the self immolation protest by a 24 yr old Tibetan named Pema Gyaltsen in Nyarong, Kham, on March 18, 2017. McLeod Ganj, March 19, 2017 Phayul Photo:Kunsang Gashon
His Holiness the Dalai Lama gazes at devotees as he visits the Mahabodhi temple near the Kalachakra venue, a day after the conclusion of 34th Kalachakra. Jan. 15, 2016 Phayul Photo: Kunsang Gashon
Three weeks after Indian PM announced Demonetization of 500 and 1000 notes residents including Tibetans queue outside State Bank of India and on-site ATMs to withdraw daily limit of 2000 Rs per account, Dharamshala, Nov. 28, 2016, Phayul Photo
more photos »
Why the Middle Way Approach Failed
By Email[Tuesday, November 11, 2008 09:02]
By Tashi Phuntsok

For the last twenty or so years, the Dalai Lama has sincerely attempted to reach out to China to resolve the Tibet issue through dialogues, fully committed to his Middle Way Policy. However, as a result of lack of commitment and will from the Chinese side, the Dalai Lama recently publicly announced that he has lost faith in the current Chinese leadership. He appealed to the Tibetan masses to take on greater role in deciding the future course of action. To discuss the future course of the Tibetan movement, a special meeting consisting of around 300 delegates representing the worldwide exiled Tibetan community, is called on in November. This is the strongest political stand the Dalai Lama has taken against China in recent time. However, it is important to reflect on why the Middle Way Policy failed?

The Middle Way was based on Deng Xiaoping's false promise. In 1979, Deng Xiaoping assured the Dalai Lama that except for the independence of Tibet, all other questions regarding Tibet could be resolved through dialogue. The Dalai Lama was further encouraged when the Chairman of the Communist Party, Hu Yaobang, following his visit to Tibet, recommended an immediate reform for Tibet which became basis for many of changes that took place in Tibet in 1980s. The new open-minded policy from the Chinese leadership swayed the Dalai Lama to put aside his demand for independence of Tibet, and that is how the Middle Way Policy came into being. Unfortunately the internal conflict within the Chinese Communist Party dashed this reasonable and promising approach for resolving the political status of Tibet.

In 1987, Hu Yaobang was sacked from his party post, accused of being sympathetic towards the students protesting at the Tiananmen Square, and consequently his Reform Policy for Tibet became unpopular. Deng Xiaoping subsequently kept distance from the Dalai Lama and Hu Yaobang's Tibet Reform Policy. What Deng Xiaoping accomplished from his initial contact with the Dalai Lama was that he succeeded in changing the goal of the Tibetan Freedom Movement from a struggle for independence to a struggle for autonomy, eliminating the question of Tibetan Nationhood in future.

The present communist leader, Hu Jintao, like his predecessor Jiang Zemin, has no desire to fulfill Deng Xiaoping's promise to the Dalai Lama. He feels no pressure to accept the Dalai Lama's Middle Way. However, Hu Jintao continues to use Deng Xiaoping's astute political tactic of luring the Dalai Lama with unpromising cryptic dialogues in attempt to rein him under their control.

In reality, Tibetans can hold out not much hope for these superficial talks. There is always a give and take in a negotiation. In the Chinese leaders' view, the Dalai Lama has nothing to offer in return. Tibet is firmly under their control and the demand for independence was voluntarily and unilaterally forsaken with the Middle Way Policy. The Chinese leaders knew well that the ephemeral international condemnation of the military crack down in Tibet in March would soon be forgiven and forgotten like the Tiananmen Square massacre, and as the world media either get bored or find something else to get excited about, world leaders would change their positions accordingly. For instance, the French President Nicolas Sarkozy, who was in vanguard calling for the boycott of the opening ceremony in the EU parliament, attended the opening ceremony after all.

The greatest strength His Holiness the Dalai Lama has at his disposal to save Tibet is not his international stature, nor is it his compassionate overture to the Chinese, but the absolute unshakable faith of his people in him. If His Holiness the Dalai Lama mobilized his people behind him in this struggle like Gandhi did against the British, the Middle Way Policy would still have a chance to work. That is perhaps what His Holiness is trying to do when he has appealed to the Tibetan masses to take on greater role in deciding the future course of action.

The Chinese leaders are well aware of the danger of the Dalai Lama's voice inside Tibet and make sure that it does not cross Tibetan borders at any cost. They ban pictures and speeches of the Dalai Lama in Tibet and constantly vilify him on the state run media. For instance, they accused the Dalai Lama for masterminding the March uprising in Tibet. Outrageous, false, baseless, whatever you call it, their deflection strategy has worked. The Dalai Lama and Tibetan Government in Exile, instead of condemning China, have quickly turned defensive, actively denying any involvement in the unrest, which may be true but it was not addressed the truth as far as the Chinese repression was concerned. It was Chinese strategy to keep the Dalai Lama from supporting the protests in Tibet. When the Dalai Lama threatened to resign, the momentum of the protests inside Tibet abated.

In order to gain any ground for the Middle Way Policy, the Dalai Lama should unequivocally encourage and support non-violent demonstrations inside Tibet and be able to threaten China of more massive demonstrations in future if they do not resolve the issue of Tibet soon. And that is a real tangible bargaining chip in negotiation. This does not compromise the Middle Way Policy, but gives strength to it.

The author is a biology teacher in a College Prep School (High School) in Connecticut USA. He can be reached at pytash@sbcglobal.net

The views expressed in this piece are that of the author and the publication of the piece on this website does not necessarily reflect their endorsement by the website.
Print Send Bookmark and Share
  Readers' Comments »
Well-said (wds1)
?? (kunsung)
high alert time for all tibetans (tenam2)
Your Comments

China's Urbancide in Tibet
An Open Letter from Tibetan Students/Researchers in Exile
Leveraging mindfulness and compassion to unlock our potential
Remembering my Teacher: Elliot Sperling (1951-2017)
Story of the Potala: World’s Highest Palace in Tibet
Trump and Tibetans
Tibetan Shyness: My story
Anguished Fear
Working to revitalize the largest Tibetan settlement in India
Photo Galleries
Phayul.com does not endorse the advertisements placed on the site. It does not have any control over the google ads. Please send the URL of the ads if found objectionable to editor@phayul.com
Copyright © 2004-2017 Phayul.com   feedback | advertise | contact us
Powered by Lateng Online