Hi guest, Register | Login | Contact Us
Welcome to Phayul.com - Our News Your Views
Thu 19, Sep 2019 06:20 PM (IST)
Search:     powered by Google
 MENU
Home
News
Photo News
Opinions
Statements &
Press Releases

Book Reviews
Movie Reviews
Interviews
Travels
Health
Obituaries
News Discussions
News Archives
Download photos from Tibet
 Latest Stories
German parliamentary delegation calls on Dalai Lama, visits CTA
Chinese Prof. echoes how China’s national park system ignored the important role of local residents
Revised TPA bill proposes sanction on Chinese official impeding Dalai Lama’s reincarnation
“I commend India for its deeply rooted religious pluralism,” Dalai Lama's in birthday wishes for Modi
Tribals in Odisha seek cancellation of Tibetan refugees’ land lease
Bill to modify Tibet policy Act 2002 introduced in US House of Representatives
US Secretary of State asks Hollywood to stop bowing to Chinese censors
Tibetans lived in three provinces as one entity: His Holiness at Tenshug ceremony
Confrontation between rival soldiers in Indo-Tibetan border in Ladakh
Authoritarian regimes’ longevity is poor: Prof. Ashis Nandy
 Latest Photo News
Nearly 3000 Students from eight countries listened to teachings of His Holiness the Dalai Lama. Three day annual teachings for youth began today. June 3, 2019. Phayul Photo: Kunsang Gashon
His Holiness the Dalai Lama is being escorted to the teaching site at Tsuglakhang temple, May 13, 2019. Phayul Photo: Kunsang Gashon
More than a thousand Tibetans, Uyghurs and supporters protest in Paris to denounce China's repression in Tibet. Xi Jinping will be on an official visit to France from Monday. Under a canopy of flags with snow lions, protesters marched from the Trocadero Human Rights Square to the Peace Wall at the other end of the Champ de Mars. 25 March 2019. Phayul photo/Norbu Wangyal
more photos »
Advertisement
Britain's Suzerain Remedy
The Economist[Friday, November 07, 2008 16:00]
From The Economist print edition

To control Tibet’s future, China extends control over its past

Middle Way for the Middle Kingdom
Middle Way for the Middle Kingdom
IT WAS an early-21st-century solution to an early-20th-century problem. On October 29th, at the end of a short statement published on his ministry’s website, Britain’s foreign secretary, David Miliband, quietly junked his country’s long-standing position on Tibet. Uniquely among the world’s countries, Britain had not explicitly recognised Chinese sovereignty over the region. Rather it acknowledged its “suzerainty”.

Quite what the term means has been obscure even to British diplomats. But what it does not mean—that China enjoys full sovereignty over China and has done so for centuries—has been enough to irk Chinese officials. It bolstered claims that Tibet was not part of China until its troops occupied it in 1951.

Mr Miliband describes Britain’s old position as “based on the geopolitics of the time”—ie, the early 1900s, when British adventurers were entering Tibet from India and the Qing empire was disintegrating in China. He says this “anachronism” has “clouded” Britain’s ability to get its points across on Tibet: on the importance of respect for human rights and of greater Tibetan autonomy.

His officials say he has merely aligned Britain’s stance with that of its European Union partners and of America. They point out that even the Dalai Lama, Tibet’s exiled spiritual leader, argues not for Tibetan independence, but for a “middle way” of greater autonomy within China. But that, in fact, is rather reminiscent of some definitions of “suzerainty”. And the Dalai Lama has never admitted, as China would like, that Tibet has always been “an inalienable part of China”. Arguing about its past status, he has insisted, is beside the point.

Moreover, he has recently shown signs of exasperation with his 20-year pursuit of the middle way. With his envoys in Beijing this week for an eighth round of talks with China since 2002, the Dalai Lama has said his trust in China’s good faith is “thinning, thinning, thinning”. His conciliatory policies have faced mounting criticism from Tibetans since bloody riots in Tibet earlier this year. A meeting later this month in Dharamsala, his seat in northern India, is to review his exiled government’s stance.

Curiously, Mr Miliband’s statement does not, in so many words, recognise Chinese sovereignty. But officials say it means that, as far as Britain is concerned, “Tibet is part of China. Full stop.” For many Tibetans, however, the correct punctuation remains a question-mark.
Print Send Bookmark and Share
 Related Stories
How David Miliband betrayed Tibet
Britain asks China to resolve Tibet issue
Did Britain Just Sell Tibet?
UK says Dalai Lama has met conditions set by China for talks
UK states its position on Tibet
  Readers' Comments »
British in Tibet knew it was independent (wds1)
shameless approach (Peta)
"“suzerainty” in sheep's clothing. (gyalpot)
Your Comments

 Other Stories
Tibetan November: come rain or shine?
Britain's Suzerain Remedy
An Open Letter to Barack Obama from Alice Walker
Japanese Lawmakers Call on Dalai Lama
Tibet Among UN Panel on Torture's Question to China
Advertisement
Advertisement
Photo Galleries
Advertisement
Phayul.com does not endorse the advertisements placed on the site. It does not have any control over the google ads. Please send the URL of the ads if found objectionable to editor@phayul.com
Copyright © 2004-2019 Phayul.com   feedback | advertise | contact us
Powered by Lateng Online
Advertisement